On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:15:04PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:33:50AM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > we still need kernels 2.2 and 2.4 for m68k: kernel 2.6 works well on
> > my Quadra950
>
> Oh? It doesn't on mine. Can you point me towards a working kernel image?
Look at what I wrote... It seems I have been delusional until the end
yesterday: a birthday party and alcohol are at fault. :/ I am quite
ashamed of myself.
I gave it a try months ago on my Quadra950 as my friend did it too
on his Quadra840AV. Hence, we both have a kernel 2.2 like all of you.
Sorry to have raise false hopes.
So to enlighten me, kernel 2.6 on m68k only supports correctly Amiga
and a bit Mac, but it does not support Atari, BVME, MVME, and Q40/Q60
at all, does it?
In that case, those unsupported subarches would be dropped for Debian
Etch to meet the release requirements, wouldn't they? Which is not a
so terrible loss IMHO, because if someone really wanted them, they
would do the support in kernel 2.6.
Cheers,
--
((__,-"""-,__)) Aurélien GÉRÔME .---.
`--)~ ~(--` Free Software Developer / \
.-'( )`-. Unix Sys & Net Admin \.@-@./
`~~`@) (@`~~` /`\_/`\
| | .''`. // _ \\
| | : :' : | \ )|_
(8___8) `. `'` /`\_`> <_/ \
`---` `- \__/'---'\__/
BOFH excuse #27: radiosity depletion
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature