[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: `new' syscalls for m68k



On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 06:19:10PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> We would just add it at the end? No compatibility problem. Syscall numbers are
> different on different architectures anyway.
> 
Yes, that's true. Most platforms don't go out of their way to have
radically out-of-order syscall tables though. But on the other hand,
it's just a cosmetic issue, so it doesn't particularly matter one way or
the other.

Attachment: pgpdyalLrgkGe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: