[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

On Gwe, 2004-09-10 at 21:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>   - Are sys_sched_[gs]etaffinity() needed for non-SMP?
Not really

>   - I disabled [sg]et_thread_area() since sys_[gs]et_thread_area() are
>     missing. Do we have to implement them, or should we use some other
>     method for Thread Local Storage?

Up to your implementation

>   - What about sys_vserver()?

Vserver project - probably dead for 2.6 since the SELinux and other
security modules can implement this same things (and a 2.6 vserver one
assumes would do likewise)

>   - What about sys_kexec_load()?

Depends if you support kexec

Reply to: