Re: `new' syscalls for m68k
On Gwe, 2004-09-10 at 21:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> - Are sys_sched_[gs]etaffinity() needed for non-SMP?
> - I disabled [sg]et_thread_area() since sys_[gs]et_thread_area() are
> missing. Do we have to implement them, or should we use some other
> method for Thread Local Storage?
Up to your implementation
> - What about sys_vserver()?
Vserver project - probably dead for 2.6 since the SELinux and other
security modules can implement this same things (and a 2.6 vserver one
assumes would do likewise)
> - What about sys_kexec_load()?
Depends if you support kexec