On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 10:09 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > I am using fvwm on my 2GHz Athlon and P4 machines with 1GB RAM each. Do you > > have to switch to a memory wasting wm once you have a faster machine? fvwm > > rocks, unfortunately the current version in testing does not like my config > > anymore that I started writing 10 years ago. So maybe I have to switch to > > Yeah, I started using fvwm about 10 years ago as well ;-) > > > gnome, which already can do a few things, that fvwm can do, or start reading > > about what changed in the new versions. Until I decide, I am keeping an old > > fvwm version around. > > I used fvwm for many years as well. A few years ago, I wanted to start using > GNOME, but I couldn't stand any GNOME-compatible window manager for longer than > a few minutes (except for icewm, which could keep me unfrustrated for about an > hour or so ;-) Then sawmill^H^H^H^Hfish arrived, I switched over, and I'm still > a happy user. > > So even if you don't want to use GNOME, if you're used to fvwm, and want to > start using a different window manager, you may like sawfish. Does it work with GNOME 2.x? I thought it was only for 1.x. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B "The UN couldn't break up a cookie fight in a Brownie meeting." Larry Miller
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part