Re: kernel-image-2.4.25
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 10:17:37AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > BTW no need to waste your time to test 2.4.x on a mac, still does not work
> > > for me, but I do take patches. Works great on my Amiga though, but with a
> >
> > Please CC those patches to linux-m68k, so I can update CVS.
> >
> > Christian: any stuff in your tree that's not yet in m68k CVS?
>
> Nothing significant, I use m68k CVS, diff it against i386 CVS and apply that
> to debian kernel-source. My patches basically just fix what kernel-source
> breaks for m68k. The only significant change is probably, that I build with
> gcc-2.95, anything newer does not seem to compile (havent't tested this
> myself yet). I'll attach the patches. If they don't apply, that means the
I use 2.95.2 20000220 myself.
> patch fixes a typo introduced by the debian kernel-source. The lyra patch is
> kind of experimental, the lyra adapter does not work as I had hoped, I
> haven't tested it in a long time. But I think there is really nothing that
> has to go into CVS.
Indeed.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Reply to: