[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Tape drive support in 2.2.10 kernal



On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 05:35:49AM +0000, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > root@gleep:~>ll /dev/st0*
> > > > crw-rw----    1 root     tape       9,   0 Jul  5  2000 /dev/st0
> > > > crw-rw----    1 root     tape       9,  96 Jul  5  2000 /dev/st0a
> > > > crw-rw----    1 root     tape       9,  32 Jul  5  2000 /dev/st0l
> > > > crw-rw----    1 root     tape       9,  64 Jul  5  2000 /dev/st0m
> > > > root@gleep:~>ll /dev/rst0*
> > > > ls: /dev/rst0*: No such file or directory
> > > 
> > > I do not have any of those devices.  Are they supposed to be created
> > > during the install procedure?  I am installing off a 3 cd set
> > Yes, they should. I have them and the install is most probably from 2.2r0.
> > The boot-floppies source also says they should be there. Sorry, I have no
> > time to do a potato test install to confirm that now.
> > man mknod. /dev/MAKEDEV st0 should do it (unless you have more than one
> > tapes ;-)
> > But... the kernel _does_ tell you about the device names:
> > Detected scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
> >                    ^^^
> > Detected scsi removable disk sdb at scsi0, channel 0, id 2, lun 0
> >                              ^^^
> > Detected scsi CD-ROM sr0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 3, lun 0
> >                      ^^^
> > If I had a tape, I would talk about st0, I bet.
> 
> Below is my dmesg.  Notice that the point where SCSI devices are detected,
> the tape drive is not assigned to a device.  Perhaps this is because the
> device nodes were not set up for the tape drive.  I'll investigate down
> this path.  Note the error on sdb can be ignored.  I have been using that
> device in raw mode, like a tape, to move files form the OpenBSD system
> on my Mac to the AmigaOS/Debian system.
Well, did you generate the device nodes as I told you? That would give you
an immediate answer.
 
Christian
-- 
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/potato



Reply to: