Re: Do we really need gcc-m68k-linux?
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 04:17:21PM -0700, idalton@ferret.dyndns.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:16:29PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> >
> > > Well, can someone NMU the package and fix the FHS issues? Perhaps
> > > someone can sponsor Ferret's upload.
> >
> > Let me know if someone does this. Right now, there may/may not be a
> > binutils-m68k to accompany it due to necessary changes in binutils (I can
> > upload one if needed).
>
> I'm getting updated to test it right now. If I recall correctly, it
> build-depends on dpkg-cross-ified libc6/m68k.
>
> And I have outlines for an automated cross-compiler builder script.
> Posted to debian-sparc maybe 8 months ago, I think.
Bleah. No luck so far on building a binutils-m68k. Will need to get that
figured out.
Ran lintian on my old package:
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/2.8.1/cc1 .note
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/2.8.1/cc1 .comment
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/2.8.1/cc1plus .note
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/2.8.1/cc1plus .comment
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/2.8.1/cc1obj .note
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/2.8.1/cc1obj .comment
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/m68k-linux-g++ .note
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/m68k-linux-g++ .comment
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/m68k-linux-c++ .note
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/m68k-linux-c++ .comment
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/m68k-linux-cpp .note
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/m68k-linux-cpp .comment
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/m68k-linux-gcc .note
W: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/m68k-linux-gcc .comment
These should just be stripped, I expect.
E: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-without-manpage m68k-linux-c++
E: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-without-manpage m68k-linux-cpp
E: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-without-manpage m68k-linux-g++
E: gcc-m68k-linux: binary-without-manpage m68k-linux-gcc
There's commented code for symlinking existing man pages.
Just no existing manpages to symlink.
E: gcc-m68k-linux: copyright-refers-to-old-directory
W: gcc-m68k-linux: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
W: gcc-m68k-linux: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
E: gcc-m68k-linux: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/doc/
FHS transition stuff.
W: gcc-m68k-linux: non-standard-dir-in-usr usr/m68k-linux/
Did we decide we were going to override FHS about this?
W: gcc-m68k-linux: no-section-field
W: gcc-m68k-linux: no-priority-field
section: devel
priority: optional or extra?
--
Ferret
I will be switching my email addresses from @ferret.dyndns.org to
@mail.aom.geek on or after September 1, 2001. This is an OpenNIC
domain. See http://www.opennic.unrated.net for details about adding
OpenNIC support to your computer, or ask your provider to add
support to their name servers.
Reply to: