Re: woohoo! glibc 2.2.1-1 building OK
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:17:56PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I have the latest gcc-2.95 source (2.95.3.ds4-6) and the latest binutils,
> with the ld patch, both compiled for potato. The libc6 build is mostly
> compiled and seems to be working fine! At least, ld.so is not crashing
> on everything like it was before.
Looks like my testing methodology was flawed.
still segfaults, but
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.. ./ld.so /bin/ls
The ld.so built with the newer gcc/binutils is identical to the
one in the 2.2.1-1 package in the distribution. But I copied over
the rebuilt libc.so.6 (to libc-2.2.1.so) into my woody chroot,
and now bash runs where previously it would segfault. So
there is definately an improvement.
It's still running the tests.
Next I could try 2.2.2-1.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>