Re: Debian 2.0 Mac install feedback
At 10:44 AM +0100 1998.02.11, Roman Hodek wrote:
>> That's a problem that has been reported before. I admit I never
>> bothered to look at dinstall to find out what fools the process into
>> thinking base was already configured ...
>
>I just looked into it (have the source tree unpacked ATM :-), and it
>thinks base is configured if /etc/hostname exists in the target
>filesystem. Has this file accidentally packed on the base disks?
Correction: This happened after configuring the modules. It then said
that base was configured, though in actuality base had *never been
installed*. So perhaps /etc/hostname was packed with the other disk that
it asked for. (I don't remember whether that was the rescue disk or the
drivers disk; it only asked for one of them, though.)
Josh
--
Joshua Juran Metamage Software Creations
=) Tools for Wizards
wanderer@metamage.com
<http://www.metamage.com/> * Creation at the highest state of the art *
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-68k-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: