[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Open Hardware Camera for Conference Recording



If the camera is not going to contain the A2D hardware, then we shouldn't bother talking about such things here, it will just distract from talking about the camera.

This does not mean we are not interested.  I am interested in smaller and cheeper, currently I spend about $600USD for a used Panasonic AG-HMC150P.

I am sure you are curious, so here is how integrated hardware solves the following issues that I can think of.

delay config: We sometimes do use separate audio hardware, and we are able to work out the delays to accommodate the different latencies so that everything remains in sync.  The problem is different hardware has different latencies and it isn't well documented so changes risk problems that are not quickly solved.   Integrated audio means never having to think about keeping the two in sync. 

quality:   typically the A2D on a camera is better than the typical usb audio device. the cameras we use have compressors, so clipping is almost non-existent.

hardware deployment:  the number of components for a typical setup is enough that it takes significant time to assemble, and it is more than a person can keep track of in their head, so inventory management and check lists are part of the process. Integrated audio means less things to pack and assemble.


On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 12:09 PM Sebastian Pichelhofer <sp@apertus.org> wrote:


On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:57 PM Kyle Robbertze <paddatrapper@debian.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 2021/01/15 15:39, Sebastian Pichelhofer wrote:
> [...]
>      >      >
>      >      > As this camera could be a perfect fit for lecture and
>     conference
>      >      > recording we want to learn more about your streaming/recording
>      >     setup and
>      >      > your requirements and discuss if what we have in mind would be
>      >      > interesting to you.
>      >
>      >     Our current set-up is documented here:
>      >
>      > https://debconf-video-team.pages.debian.net/docs/room_setup.html
>     <https://debconf-video-team.pages.debian.net/docs/room_setup.html>
>      >   
>       <https://debconf-video-team.pages.debian.net/docs/room_setup.html
>     <https://debconf-video-team.pages.debian.net/docs/room_setup.html>>
>      >
>      >     We currently work at 720p capture at 50 or 60 fps (filming
>     country
>      >     dependant) from the cameras, streaming and recording.
>      >
>      >
>      > Thanks!
>      >
>      > What cameras do you use/prefer currently?
>      > IIRC at FOSDEM these were prosumer HD camcorders.
>
>     Sony PXW-X70/4k
>
>      > Is interlacing an issue with these devices?
>
>     We always shoot progressive and haven't run into any interlacing issues
>     that I know of
>
>
> OK.
>
> So a camera that outputs a low latency live stream over Ethernet in a
> format that voctomix would understand would be interesting I assume?

Very much so. Ideally with mixed in audio so we can let the camera
handle the audio/video sync before it gets to Voctomix.

Very good!

We do not have or plan to develop an audio related interface ourselves but in theory could attach any existing USB audio device that works under Linux.
We will test and verify this is works properly with audio/video sync.
On the other hand I assume that you would be just as happy with the audio device not connected to the camera but voctomix directly as long as everything remains in sync?

Regards Sebastian



Cheers
Kyle


--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Kyle Robbertze
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://wiki.debian.org/KyleRobbertze


--
Carl K


Reply to: