> - we probably need to get some feedback from DebConf team, they already > discuss[1] it, maybe somebody will be willing to comment in this thread. > Two specific questions for DebConf team: are you happy with Kanboard or > might you use another solution for 2019? Do you see a possibility of > running a shared instance of it or do you really want your instance to > be DebConf only? I've been using KanBoard for a while now, both for DebConf and for my job. I'm also the one doing most of the admin work for the kanban.debian.net instance at the moment. I can't speak for the DC19 folks, but I like KanBoard a lot. The main developer is doing a lot of work and KanBoard keeps improving. The available plugins are nice too. Overall, it seems like a mature project. We are currently in the process of migrating the kanban.debian.net instance to DSA infrastructure. DSA has been very responsive and the only reason this has not been done yet is that I don't have a lot of spare time these days. At the moment, this instance is hosted on the personal server of an ex-dc17 team member, and thus not suitable for massive usage. Once migrated to DSA infra, I have plans to make it available to the whole Debian project. I have to talk with DSA about it, but as I see it, the easiest path would be to use the Gitlab plugin and to let people authenticate using their salsa.debian.org account. If I had to give an ETA on this, I would say it should be done in 3 months? My university semester will be over and I should be a DD by then, making it easier for DSA to give me access to a VM. Hope that helps, -- pollo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature