El 13/11/15 a las 00:50, martin f krafft escribió: > also sprach Laura Arjona Reina <larjona@debian.org> [2015-11-13 07:50 +1300]: >> * Tweet thanking individual sponsors, once they are published in the >> website, using @debconf (Bernelle and Madduck I think they have >> permissions via TweetDeck). > > Team @DebConf (that's Twitter parlance) consists of indiebio, zobel, > azeem, Maulkin, buxy, and myself. If anyone wants to join, let us > know. > > The only thing I would do differently this year is to include > sponsor logos in the tweets, and I think that the brochure promises > that too. > >> * 3 times during the year, write a blog post > > where? On blog.dc.o/dcX? Maybe bits.debian.org has more audience and it's what sponsors expect? (Last year there were blog posts in blog.debconf.org/dc15 about the ongoing DC15 organization, and sponsors were thanked in bits.debian.org. No idea about former debconfs). I have no strong opinion about which one is better (a bit biased towards bits because I think it has more audience, but it's only a supposition, I have no data), and I can work on both platforms without problems. Other opinions? -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature