also sprach Tassia Camoes Araujo <tassia@debian.org> [2015-07-15 15:11 +0200]:
> Looking at the page we have no clue that the organization is
> independent from DebConf. And I wouldn't be surprised if 100% of
> people think it is not, since it will happen during debcamp, in
> the same venue, and announced inside our website.
How about I add an explicit note at the top that this is
independent?
> What I think is problematic about this is that our teams have no
> voice in how the workshop is structured, and it will be seen as
> part of our work, which is not true.
This applies to every single event at DebConf btw., i.e. if Jane Doe
organises a BoF, it's seen as part of DebConf and yet you have no
voice in it.
> This is a completely new thing for me (and probably for many other
> people) so please do not publish anything before we have enough
> people engaged in the discussion.
What sort of discussion? About the content/structure of the
workshop? Or about whether this can be organised in the context of
DebConf15 and advertised as a loose part of it?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)