Steve Langasek dijo [Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 09:19:52AM -0700]: > > For me, making them responsible implies that they are either actually > > taking these decisions, or exercise some sort of leadership onto the > > team actually taking these. > > > If we expect the DC$n teams to decide on the use of 'Debian resources' > > on their own, then these teams should be made responsible, not the > > chairs. > > I don't expect that at all. A team that is only handling the organization > of a single year's conference shouldn't have anything resembling the > authority to decide on their own how Debian resources are used. > > The "local team" will have lots of good ideas and enthusiasm for how to put > them into effect. But they *must not* do this without the oversight of the > DPL or delegates - they can propose these ideas, but must not assume that > being the local team gives them the authority to use Debian resources > without discussion. > > For the past few years, we've fared well with strong, well-organized local > teams that pose little risk to the Debian Project. This has not always been > the case. The organizational structure of the DebConf team needs to handle > the cases when we *don't* have a strong local team, not just the cases when > we do. YES YES YES. Please, add my personal emphasis to everything here said by Steve.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature