also sprach Tassia Camoes Araujo <tassia@debian.org> [2015-08-31 06:26 +0200]:
> I've just created a "Discussion" session in our wiki to collect
> the main points brought to the table from each one of you so that
> we can easily keep track of where the discussion is going.
>
> https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Teams#Discussion
While I am sure it's appreciated that you put all this time into
these summaries, I don't think this approach is appropriate.
First of all, you claim this to be a proposal, and that anyone can
submit counter-proposals. How? Should we make direct changes to the
wiki page?
As I have suggested to you in private mail, I think it'd be best if
you reverted all changes and instead created e.g.
https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Teams/2015_ChairsProposal with your
text and changes.
This would allow counter-proposals in the same namespace, without
giving any more weight to the one made by the chairs.
Second, taking stuff out of context is a sure-fire way to
misrepresent or miss the whole picture. At the very least, I think
you should include links to the original messages from where you
pulled a quote.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
DebConf17 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf17
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)