[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] Unmanned video setup/BoF remote participation



also sprach Margarita Manterola <margamanterola@gmail.com> [2015-06-21 21:30 +0200]:
> Minutes are nice and fine, but they are not the same. Whenever
> possible, we should strive to provide live participation.

I don't have any problem with all that's proposed as long as it's up
to the BoF organisers to opt against video streaming/live
participation.

However, I do disagree with this quoted point of view. Live
participation and minutes are two separate things, and minutes of
a meeting where decisions are made or plans hatched have more
posterity and will help people who aren't available to participate
live. Minutes also help document steps and progress whereas live
streaming is ephemeral.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  DebConf orga team
`. `'`
  `-  DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
      DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Reply to: