Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14

[Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:13:14AM +0000, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:52:39PM +0100, Moray Allan wrote:
> > Personally, I preferred the original Portland proposal of trying a
> > more interleaved schedule -- for me, having blocks of three days for
> > talks / hacking and BOFs just recreates the DebConf/DebCamp split the
> > same as in other recent years, wasting the opportunity to experiment
> > with how a different format works.  If an interleaved format *doesn't*
> > work as well, we wouldn't need to repeat it, but I was ready to
> > believe that it might indeed be better -- we won't find out if we
> > never try it.
> 
> I concur.

Are you both saying we should go with Steve's original suggestion:

http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20131001.175026.0a50b91b.en.html

?

If not can you make a concrete proposal that provides what you think
should happen?

J.

-- 
      Hats off to the insane.      |  .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux Developer
                                   | : :' :  Happy to accept PGP signed
                                   | `. `'   or encrypted mail - RSA
                                   |   `-    key on the keyservers.