Re: [Debconf-team] Conference bag proposal
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org> wrote:
> Patty Langasek <harmoney@dodds.net> writes:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 01:55:59PM +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote:
>>> begin quotation from Arne Wichmann (in <[🔎] 20130606101507.GE22242@anhrefn.saar.de>):
>>> > Appended is a censored proposal for a conference bag. Is this design
>>> > acceptable, and if not, what would be needed to change?
>>
>>> So, after some discussions I have 2 other designs which should make the
>>> distinction between gold/platinum sponsors and bag sponsor clearer. As
>>> timing is an issue now (printing takes a month) I urge you to answer
>>> quickly (until Tuesday) if you do not like this proposal.
>>
>> I think the proposal looks good, though I will say that the 'bag sponsored
>> by' looks a little ... akward. I understand the sentiment behind it, but it
>> just seems weird. Could we keep that design, but simply omit the words and
>> have people still be happy? The gold/platinum sponsor logos are still
>> prominent, and the bag sponsor logo is separated, but still present and
>> obvious.
>>
>> Anyone else?
>
> The "sponsored by" addition was done specifically because of a comment
> after the last proposal was sent to the list. So changing this again
> would mean a step backwards. I'm personally not 100% convinced that it's
> necessary, but I'd rather produce the bags as they are now than doing
> yet another design round. What we have now is kind of a compromise
> proposal.
At this point the most important things are is to get Arne a "yes" and
a count of bags needed. Are we in a shape to do that yet? (The
conservative headcount is the one that I don't think anyone has
tackled yet.)
Thanks,
Brian
>
> Gaudenz
>
> --
> Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
> Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
> ~ Samuel Beckett ~
> _______________________________________________
> Debconf-team mailing list
> Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Reply to: