[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Debconf-team] Interlaken - alternative



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1




I've just visited Interlaken this morning.

My initial impression is that:

a) it is a viable alternative - it is not necessarily cheaper, but it
would work just as well as Le Camp

b) there may be more flexibility in the contract - no need to pay for
empty beds or meals.  We can book now, and then give final figures
(bed counts, etc) in March perhaps.  The price per bed would be fixed
now, but the total contract price would be fixed when we give the
final numbers.

c) no single site will provide all services needed.  Hostels and
hotels can provide all accommodation, very scalable.  There are also a
range of meeting venues, including some military buildings which are
sometimes used for expos and parties and are unlikely to be as
expensive as the world-reknowned `Congress Centre'.


I'm happy to spend more time researching and documenting this
alternative - but if there is any outright objection to this, or if
someone is about to sign another contract (which doesn't appear to be
the case), then please let me know.




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=OQ1e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: