Richard Darst dijo [Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 06:35:26PM -0400]: > Hi, > > These people are currently listed under the talks team: > (…) > We need some people (doesn't have to be from this list) to lead the > team right now mainly getting a call for papers out, along with > deciding any changes which should be done this year. If someone wants > to do this and it's your first time - that's great, we'll help. Ok, so Richard persuaded me to take the lead of this team. Man, does this man have his way with words! > This team should probably start forming and getting a call for papers > out. Luckily, this is easier due to the past announcement archive: > http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/PastAnnouncements > > Whoever is in charge of the team would then answer any questions from > attendees, call for more volunteers to help with the rating, arrange > talks teams meetings to do rating, notify people, and continue to > answer any questions that come up. I hope the seven people already listed for this task are a big enough team to do the talks rating. I do not anticipate the need of growing it - at least not yet. At some point, closer to the conference, the talk selection will be done and we will then form a talk scheduling team (as usual), which might be of different composition. > We have a global team meeting tomorrow, so whoever would like to head > this up, if you could talk a bit at the meeting, we can send you off. > In the meantime, please reply to this mail. I will be unable to be present during the meeting. However, please discuss proposed dates - Please assume all infrastructural work will be ready (i.e. today's discussion on IRC regarding registration by Penta). I guess the CFP should open effective immediately when registration is opened. We should agree on some timeline for talk submissions (to be approved as official - I don't think I have to go into details right now :) ), a timeline for talks acceptance announcement, for schedule announcement, etc. Greetings,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature