Hi, On Sonntag, 27. März 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > To wrap up on this, I'm fine with having debconf's own earmarks / > accounts, as long as there are the periodic merge windows we have > discussed elsewhere. [...] Yay. Glad we finally all agree on how handle this! :) > I'm under the impression that we have a general agreement on the > separate earmark scheme, provided that it's alive only for a specific > time window. We "just" need to find a way to define the time window ... How about: Time windows starts with the first transaction and by default ends 2 months after DebConf. If the default should be changed, this needs agreement between Debian auditor and DebConf accounting team/person (and should be discussed in mails send to debconf-team@l.dc.o and cc: to the Debian auditor). ? Alternativly: s/2 months/3 months/ cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.