Moin, On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Is anyone interested in acting as Scheduler? Does anyone with > experience from scheduling past debconfs have advice to offer? do not schedule anything without giving at least 24h "warning" in advance. never. (and to repeat: I'm not only saying this because of video...) (And if I really need to explain why again, I guess I will do so.) > 1) Plenaries > > There was quite a bit of discussion about having a select few events > scheduled with no other concurrent events. We are calling these > "Plenaries" for the moment. If we decide we want to have them, we might > run into a bit of a space issue, as the larger of our two talks rooms > only seats 200 people. The video team can set up the smaller talk room > as a spillover area with live video, though. > > Do we want to have Plenaries? If so, how often? One per day is the > most anyone has proposed so far. It's not clear that anyone wants to do > away with the concept entirely, though (e.g. zack's Bits from the DPL > seems to have general support as a Plenary). Do other debconf > organizers feel strongly about this? I really like the idea. The ssl thing from dc8 comes to mind as well as other broad topics. cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.