Re: [Debconf-team] Public participants list - Is it OK this way?

To: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
Subject: Re: [Debconf-team] Public participants list - Is it OK this way?
From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:16:02 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200602172316.10741.debian@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200602171753.51573.debian@layer-acht.org>
References: <[🔎] 20060216153239.GA4567@gwolf.org> <[🔎] 200602171753.51573.debian@layer-acht.org>

On Friday 17 February 2006 17:53, Holger Levsen wrote:
> (Even the CCC (who has been praying this for long) "lost" private

preaching not praying :)


regards,
	Holger

Attachment: pgpzNrcXrAu4Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- [Debconf-team] Public participants list - Is it OK this way?
  - From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org>
- Re: [Debconf-team] Public participants list - Is it OK this way?
  - From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [Debconf-team] inviting LWN again?
Next by Date: Re: [Debconf-team] Re: [michael.jennings@intel.com: DebConf Paper submission]
Previous by thread: Re: [Debconf-team] Public participants list - Is it OK this way?
Next by thread: [Debconf-team] inviting LWN again?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread