Re: [Debconf-team] Re: bof proposal periode until last minute

[Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>]

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:58:18AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> the only real difference (for me) between the talks that went 
> through the academic committee and were approved and those 
> which were rejected and downgraded to BoFs was the inclusion 
> of a paper in the proceedings, instead of just the abstract. 
> BoFs requested in anticipation (i.e., not the glasshouse
> ones) were scheduled and treated just as normal talks

And as kind request, this year please don't schedule BoF's to
an big auditorium. Last year some BoF-keepers got quite 
suprised. Having a dedicated smallish BoF room(s) would be 
nice.

Cheers,
Riku