[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Tennis courts



Hi all,

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 04:32:27PM +0200, Bernelle Verster wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Jonathan Carter <jcarter@linux.com> wrote:
> > Started a wiki page for this so that others can easily find this information
> > too as it becomes available:
> >
> > https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16/Tennis
> 
> Tennis wiki updated
> :)

So, the verdict is:
- We don't pay for use of the courts (but they need to be booked, and
  will be less available during weekends than during weekdays)
- We do pay for rental of rackets and/or buying balls, and they do
  somewhat expect you to drink something in their bar (which does not
  feature free beer).

Given that, I think doing a little tournament would be nice. I'll even
volunteer to officiate the final[1][2]. However, TTBOMK so far only four
people have expressed interest in playing some tennis, which wouldn't be
enough, really.

If somewhere between 6 and 8 people sign up for a tournament, we could
do a pool-type tournament with two groups, with the winner of each pool
playing the final. That would mean every participant would need to play
2 (6 or 7 players) or 3 (7 or 8 players), with the winners of each group
playing one more match (the final).

If more than that sign up, doing a pool-type tournament would probably
not be realistic anymore, and we'll fall back to a knock-out tournament
instead.

Thoughts? Interested participants?

[1] http://grep.be/blog/en/life/new_jobs,
    http://grep.be/blog/en/life/tennis/whoo/, and
    http://www.tennisvlaanderen.be/dashboard?userId=779163
[2] provided I'm not one of the finalists myself ;-)

-- 
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
       people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
       and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
 -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: