also sprach Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debconf.org> [2014-09-19 21:49 +0200]: > I think it's Okay to _suggest_ available tasks to sponsored > attendees (as well as to all attendees IMHO), but I don't think it > is Okay to _require_ their accomplishment. This is okay at LISA, but LISA is also a commcercial conference without a community you contribute to for the rest of the year, and the bursaries team's criteria do look at contribution to the project during the rest of the year, rather than willingness to pick up volunteer tasks. Given that we are a volunteer-run conference, I think everyone already knows that we need all the help, and many already pick up pieces where they can and see them. Part of the problem IMHO has been that the orga team wasn't really prepared to coordinate such willingness, and so much potential has been unused in the past, I think. So we should make sure to have enough tasks available for people to sign up, and try to make it clear that this is expected from *everyone*. Maybe IRC-proxy is one such way to engage as a volunteer. I was not trying to suggest that sponsored people should feel more "indebted". But we would appreciate any input we can get on how we could make this more "attractive" to attendees. Hope this clarifies (at least my position), -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)