Re: [Debconf-discuss] 3G prepaid cards for Banja Luka region
Definitely there are good offers for postpaid users but postpaid is
not suitable for visitors.
And yes, it worth mentioning that m:tel is more focused on market in
Republic of Srpska while BHTelecom is more focused on market in
Federacija BiH. But concerning signal coverage there very little
difference. And If one needs only prepaid data, definitely the best
option would be BHTelecom "ULTRA INTERNET" plan.
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Josip Rodin <joy@entuzijast.net> wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:28:10AM +0200, vedran wrote:
>> In Bosnia you generally have only three GSM operators :
>
> BTW it should be mentioned that these three telcos look like 'baby Bells'
> of various regions, and the local (former?) monopolist in Banja Luka is m:tel.
> So it would be good if someone could generally explain whether the others are
> competitive as far as mobile telephony in the Banja Luka region is concerned.
>
> For example, is the data signal coverage sufficient for someone to take a
> walk around the city as well as the surroundings and be able to use Google
> Maps along the way.
>
>> Eronet - www.eronet.ba (I don't know about their 3G support):
>> 1MB around 1.5 km
>> I dont' know if they have only data plans.
>
> I googled this and found that their prepaid mobile Internet tariff is described at
> http://www.eronet.ba/privatni-korisnici/tarife/hej-tarife/mobilni-internet/start
> and it's 1.3 KM / 1 MB. There are less costly options, but only for
> subscribers (postpaid) - same goes for other providers BTW.
> Also it looks like they advertize EDGE only:
> http://www.eronet.ba/privatni-korisnici/podrska/pokrivenost
> A Wikipedia list says they do have UMTS since 2010, but without a reference,
> so that might as well be based on a press-release-of-the-day only.
> All in all, it looks like a clear pass.
>
> --
> 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
> _______________________________________________
> Debconf-discuss mailing list
> Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
>
Reply to: