Re: how to rescue this backup data
在 2010-01-03日的 20:11 +0100,Thomas Schmitt写道:
> Hi,
>
> it comes to me that 1256091 is not a probable
> exact start address. It should at least be
> divisible by 16.
> Well, check what is written in the first
> sessions. Hopefully this will yield a better
> number than 28. 0x17 = 23 would be nice.
That is kind of wired!! Because:
1256119 - 23 = 1256096
as I said, I have:
# dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/sr1 | grep -A 4 "#2.:"
READ TRACK INFORMATION[#2]:
Track State: partial/complete
Track Start Address: 1256096*2KB
Free Blocks: 0*2KB
Track Size: 155440*2KB
So it shows the 2nd session track start address 1256096 is what you
guessed.
This means, the DVD+R that was there in /dev/sr0 /had been/ the DVD+R
that was there in /dev/sr1. It was the same disk! The backup operator
did not make a mistake.
But then why mount would not work?
Jamaica:~ # mount /dev/sr1 /mnt/
mount: block device /dev/hdc is write-protected, mounting
read-only
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
Jamaica:~ # mount -o session=1 /dev/sr1 /mnt/
mount: block device /dev/hdc is write-protected, mounting
read-only
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
Jamaica:~ # dmesg | tail
wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:25:86:01:8a:de
wlan0: authentication with AP 00:25:86:01:8a:de timed out
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744073708710576
for device hdc
UDF-fs: No anchor found
UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
UDF-fs: No anchor found
UDF-fs: No partition found (1)
This is really wired. I think I should just try my luck by using:
Jamaica:~ # mount -t iso9660 -o sbsector=1256096 /dev/sr1 /mnt/
mount: block device /dev/hdc is write-protected, mounting
read-only
Jamaica:~ # ls /mnt/
1.html functions.asp mm_menu.js
1_old.html global.asp mm_menu1.js
....
So now I got my backup data.
What did I revealed? Was there a bug in kernel module for iso9660? Was
there a bug in mkisofs?
Anyway, thanks for providing necessary information that I finally got
the backup data.
Reply to: