Re: "logical unit communication failure" c2scan NEC ND-4550A 1.07
Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling schrieb am 2006-02-13:
>
> > Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >I have the impression that you are using Linux and Linux definitely
> > > >does not fall into this category (since ~ 2001, no SCSI bug I am aware of has
> > > >been fixed in Linux). In case of unknown problems, it makes sense to change
> > > >things in order to find the reason.
> > > >
> > > Then you should go back and read your own postings! The bug allowing
> > > unfiltered SCSI commands to devices was fixed and you complained about
> > > it for two years. You were very aware of it.
> >
> > ????
> >
> > Filtering SCSI commands was an unannounced change of the interface
> > that needs to be called a bug. I still do not see any fix for this.
>
> SCSI commands are not filtered for processes with RAWIO capability,
> which root processes have by default.
It seems that you did loose contact to reality :-(
Try to inform yourself about the problems or stay quiet.
> The recommended installation on Linux is still setuid, so any claims
> cdrecord were affected are hypocritical.
Wrong again, check the recent workarounds in libscg/cdrecord to
understand that the problem was not fixed in the Linux kernel but
I introduced a workaround.
> Plus, you have been offered by Linux developers to send a list of
> commands that need to be allowed, you have not accepted that offer.
Are you really so ignorant?
I did tell people how to extract such a list _and_ I told them
that such a list is subject to daily changes in case a new drive needs
new SCSI commands.
Jörg
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
Reply to: