Re: cdrtools cdrecord/cdrecord.c
Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> wrote:
> >> Oh, FFS. Give it a rest, Joerg. Most of the work that the various
> >> Linux distro people have done on cdrtools is to fix real bugs that you
> >> won't acknowledge. Sometimes users simply want things to work on their
> >> systems, rather than random Solaris advocacy...
> >
> >Should this be a joke?
> >
> >Please tell me why an unmodified cdrecord runs best on Linux and
> >why > 90% of all bugs on the Debian bug tracking system for cdrtools
> >are caused by the modifications done by Debian.
>
> *snort* Go on, justify that bullshit statement. Please, I'd love you
> to try. Show us bug numbers.
What do you like to prove with this kind of silly response?
Many of the bug entries already include comments from me that
explain the reason for the related bug...
Show me a justification for the patches applied by Debian on cdrecord.
None of the patches fixes a problem.
Jörg
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
Reply to: