Re: Why burnfree is off by default?
"ROBERTOJIMENOCA@terra.es" <ROBERTOJIMENOCA@terra.es> writes:
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>> "ROBERTOJIMENOCA@terra.es" <ROBERTOJIMENOCA@terra.es> writes:
>> > Why complicate the lives of cdrecord users with lots of options that
>> > don't even have a use case?
>> Just because your view is limited and you cannot conceive a use case
>> (which is not bad in itself, just don't argue :-)), does not mean there
>> is none.
> Please explain the use case, otherwise we won't see it.
The burden of proof is with you, you want the code to change in spite of
not being the maintainer.
You don't need to see the use case, but YOU need to PROVE the switch is
unneeded with every existing hardware before you can expect Jörg to even
consider removing it.
Just because the DAU of the day assumes his defaults are the only sane
ones doesn't mean everybody else shares his POV.
Proper compact discs were meant to be written in streaming DAO mode, period.