[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dbm symbols? In or out?



This is much more interesting:

# db3
[msw@pitr anaconda]$ rpm -q --redhatrequires --dbapi 1 libdb-3.1.so
apache-1.3.14-10
db3-utils-3.1.17-5
gnorpm-0.95.1-8
kdeadmin-2.0.20010205-1
nss_db-2.2-1
nss_db-compat-2.2-1
nss_ldap-143-1
pam-0.74-8
perl-5.6.0-11
perl-Perl-RPM-0.291-2
php-4.0.4pl1-6
python-1.5.2-29
rpm-4.0.2-0.37
rpm-build-4.0.2-0.37
rpm-python-4.0.2-0.37
rpm2html-1.5-4
rpmfind-1.6-4
sendmail-8.11.2-7
ucd-snmp-4.2-4
ucd-snmp-utils-4.2-4

[msw@pitr anaconda]$ rpm -q --define "_dbpath /usr/lib/rpmdb/alpha-redhat-linux/powertools" --whatrequires libdb-3.1.so
cyrus-imapd-2.0.9-1
netatalk-1.5pre2-4
postfix-20010202-2

# db2
[msw@pitr anaconda]$ rpm -q --redhatrequires --dbapi 1 libdb.so.3
cyrus-sasl-gssapi-1.5.24-16
db2-devel-2.4.14-5
nmh-1.0.4-7
perl-5.6.0-11
php-4.0.4pl1-6

[msw@pitr anaconda]$ rpm -q --define "_dbpath /usr/lib/rpmdb/alpha-redhat-linux/powertools" --whatrequires libdb.so.3  
exim-3.22-7

# db1
[msw@pitr anaconda]$ rpm -q --redhatrequires --dbapi 1 libdb.so.2.1
abiword-0.7.12-3
anaconda-7.1-1.200102140708
balsa-1.1.0-1
bug-buddy-1.2-1
control-center-1.2.2-4
db1-1.85-5
dia-0.86-3
ee-0.3.12-1
gaim-0.11.0pre4-1
gdk-pixbuf-0.8.0-6
gdm-2.0beta2-40
gedit-0.9.4-2
glade-0.5.9-3
gmc-4.5.51-23
gnome-applets-1.2.4-2
gnome-core-1.2.4-8
gnome-games-1.2.0-9
gnome-kerberos-0.2.2-1
gnome-libs-1.2.8-7
gnome-linuxconf-0.64-1
gnome-lokkit-0.43-4
gnome-media-1.2.0-11
gnome-objc-1.0.2-9
gnome-pim-1.2.0-6
gnome-print-0.25-5
gnome-utils-1.2.1-3
gnorpm-0.95.1-8
gnumeric-0.61-6
gtop-1.0.11-1
inn-2.3.1-2
kdeadmin-2.0.20010205-1
libglade-0.14-2
locale_config-0.2-4
magicdev-0.3.0-3
openssh-askpass-gnome-2.3.0p1-16
pan-0.9.1-2
perl-Perl-RPM-0.291-2
pygnome-1.0.53-6
pygnome-applet-1.0.53-6
pygnome-capplet-1.0.53-6
pygnome-libglade-0.6.6-6
python-1.5.2-29
rep-gtk-gnome-0.15-3
rp3-1.1.7-1
rpm-4.0.2-0.37
rpm-build-4.0.2-0.37
rpm-python-4.0.2-0.37
rpm2html-1.5-4
rpmfind-1.6-4
sawfish-0.36-2
ucd-snmp-4.2-4
ucd-snmp-utils-4.2-4
vim-X11-6.0-0.24
wmconfig-0.9.9-3
xchat-1.6.3-3
xmms-gnome-1.2.4-8

[msw@pitr anaconda]$ rpm -q --define "_dbpath /usr/lib/rpmdb/alpha-redhat-linux/powertools" --whatrequires libdb.so.2.1
ami-gnome-1.0.8-4
bmud-0.5-4
chbg-1.1-2
cheops-0.60pre5-14
deadftp-0.0.9-1
etherape-0.5.6-6
ggv-0.95-2
glimmer-1.0.1-1
gMoonClock-0.2-3
gnobog-0.4.2-1
gnomail-0.0.3-6
gnomba-0.6.2-4
gnomeicu-0.94.1-2
gnome-pm-0.9.3-2
gnome-telnet-2.4-1
gnotepad+-1.3.3-1
gnucash-1.4.9-3
gpgp-0.4-6
gtkBitchX-1.0c17-5
Gtk-Perl-0.7004-4
gtktalog-0.11.3-1
gxtar-0.1.0-7
hypersrc-2.1.6-1
pavuk-0.9pl28b-1
powershell-0.8-3
python2-2.0-3
rCalc-0.2.2-1
rdj-0.2.5-1
sanduhr-0.3.50-1
screem-0.3.0-3
soundtracker-0.6.1-2
vsa-0.9.7-7
webalizer-2.01_06-5
zapping-0.5.9.20010206-1
ZZplayer-0.9-1

# dbm
[msw@pitr anaconda]$ rpm -q --redhatrequires --dbapi 1 libgdbm.so.2
LPRng-3.7.4-15
am-utils-6.0.4-5
auth_ldap-1.4.7-1
autofs-3.1.7-8
balsa-1.1.0-1
cyrus-sasl-1.5.24-16
gnome-applets-1.2.4-2
gnome-utils-1.2.1-3
gnupg-1.0.4-9
gq-0.3.1-1
gtop-1.0.11-1
kdebase-2.0.20010212-1
libgtop-1.0.10-1
libgtop-examples-1.0.10-1
librep-0.13.3-1
librep-devel-0.13.3-1
mars-nwe-0.99pl20-2
nss_ldap-143-1
openldap-2.0.7-12
openldap-clients-2.0.7-12
openldap-servers-2.0.7-12
openldap12-1.2.11-4
perl-5.6.0-11
php-4.0.4pl1-6
php-ldap-4.0.4pl1-6
pine-4.33-1.0.5
python-1.5.2-29
sendmail-8.11.2-7
squid-2.3.STABLE4-9
xemacs-21.1.14-5
ypserv-1.3.11-11

[msw@pitr anaconda]$ rpm -q --define "_dbpath /usr/lib/rpmdb/alpha-redhat-linux/powertools" --whatrequires libgdbm.so.2
cyrus-imapd-2.0.9-1
gnomeicu-0.94.1-2
ntop-1.3.2-4
python2-2.0-3
slmon-0.4.0-1
vacation-1.2.2-2

This is just the way we have things configured - some packages can use
various (incompatible) db interfaces.  And we won't even start on the
on-disk format incompatibilities...

Matt

On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 07:45:06PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> None hit my right off. Everything I have appears to be using db1, or db3.
> The only typical user of ndbm has been sendmail because sendmail people
> recommend it as its faster than db1 or gdbm. And sendmail happily supports
> all sorts of db species



Reply to: