[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Consultants list: new tag "contact" to provide a spam-free contact method



Hello all,

several consultants have reported, that they receive mass of spam via
their listed address.
And one has asked, if there is the possibility to list a contact webpage 
instead of a e-mail address (as for example in 
http://www.aptix.com.ar/contacto.php).

In times of spam I consider this a good idea.
Thus a (tested) proposal:

(Yes, I could put such a contact URL into "URL: ", but "Contact: " would be 
the correct way.)



Index: consultant.defs
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/consultants/consultant.defs,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 consultant.defs
--- consultant.defs	16 Aug 2008 14:00:15 -0000	1.15
+++ consultant.defs	26 Feb 2013 14:01:02 -0000
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
 <define-tag address whitespace=delete>
   <strong><gettext domain="consultants">Address:</gettext></strong> %attributes<br>
 </define-tag>
+<define-tag contact whitespace=delete>
+  <strong><gettext domain="consultants">Contact:</gettext></strong> 
+  <a href="%0">%0</a><br>
+</define-tag>
 <define-tag phone whitespace=delete>
   <strong><gettext domain="consultants">Phone:</gettext></strong> %attributes<br>
 </define-tag>

Comments?




Other than that, 
http://www.debian.org/consultants/info.en.html
contains:
	If you wish to be added to the list of consultants, please mail any of 
	the following information in English to consultants@debian.org:

	Name
	Company
	Address
	...

As a non-native english speaker I want to ask how this was exactly meant: 
is "any" meant as "every" or as "some"?
I would propose to change that clearly.


Holger



-- 
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 3.0.2
    under  D e b i a n   G N U / L I N U X   6.0  ( S q u e e z e )
        Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://linuxcounter.net/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


Reply to: