Bug#263084: "Sexist language" not fact
The document linked from the Debian-Women FAQ says in
http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/ellens/Gender/pap/node21.html#SECTION00530000000000000000
that "gender-neutral language" is "currently under debate". As I
understand it, one's opinion probably depends on the position taken
about behaviourism and mentalism, and things like the Sapir-Whorf
hypothesis.
It seems useful or sensible to balance obvious unjustifiable male
defaults over time, mostly as a consequence of other actions (such as
delegates being more representative). A simplistic purge of
third-person-singular pronouns and the "-man" morpheme seems to make
it harder to read for everyone. Is there clear support that there's
benefit from a purge?
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Please email about: BT alternative for line rental+DSL;
Education on SMEs+EU FP6; office filing that works fast
Reply to: