Bug#123094: wrong reference to gcc-2.95.2

[Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

reopen 123094
thanks

Josip Rodin writes:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 10:14:56PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > > > Package: www.debian.org
> > > > > > Severity: important
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > It seems, that on 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >    http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/gcc.html
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > the wrong source package is referenced. There is no 2.95.2 in testing
> > > > > > ... gcc-2.95.4 is.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It looks like you were given an ambiguous reference
> > > > > (testing/unstable). Those are two different distributions. Is 2.95.4
> > > > > in unstable?
> > > > 
> > > > in testing and in unstable.
> > > 
> > > This file,
> > > 
> > > -rw-rw-r--    1 treacy   debwww    2255745 Dec  8 15:07 testing/main.Sources
> > > 
> > > includes:
> > > 
> > > 110f1e5b3adfefc9d7be071e91c54f6a 13721892 gcc_2.95.2.orig.tar.gz
> > > 
> > > And the output of `madison gcc` on auric includes
> > > 
> > >        gcc |  2.95.2-20 |       testing | source
> > > 
> > > This is not a bug on the packages.d.o web site.
> > 
> > so you acknowledge the bug and close it? strange ... which package
> > should it reassigned to?
> 
> I don't know if it's a bug at all. You should endeavour to find out why the
> 2.95.2-20 source is included in testing.

I see, so better close it before knowing its a bug ...

- gcc_2.95.2 source is in testing
- gcc-defaults_0.16 is in testing
- gcc-2.95_2.95.4 is in testing

so madison is correct, but the web page generation get's it wrong,
that gcc-defaults is the source for gcc.