[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#123094: wrong reference to gcc-2.95.2



On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 05:20:03PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: important
> 
> It seems, that on 
> 
>    http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/gcc.html
> 
> the wrong source package is referenced. There is no 2.95.2 in testing
> ... gcc-2.95.4 is.
> 
> 

It looks like you were given an ambiguous reference
(testing/unstable). Those are two different distributions. Is 2.95.4
in unstable?

Content-Description: forwarded message
> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:12:18 +0000 (GMT)
> From: mcrogan@purdue.edu
> User-Agent: EMIKO/1.13.9 (Euglena tripteris) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 10) (Capitol Reef) (i386-debian-linux)
> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid
> To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
> Reply-To: mcrogan@purdue.edu
> Subject: Re: Bug#123067: gcc: Rebuild of gcc 1:2.95.2-13 from source with extra CFLAGS causes Internal compiler error (gpc1 coredumps)
> 
> >>>>> On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:27:45 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 
>  > it looks like you tried again with gcc-2.95.2.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thank you for the reply.  I downloaded the source files displayed at the
> bottom of the Debian web page for Package: gcc 2:2.95.4-8 at
> ``http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/gcc.html''.  The files
> include ``gcc_2.95.2.orig.tar.gz'' which extracts into the
> ``gcc-2.95.2'' directory.  After patching using ``zcat
> gcc_2.95.2-20.diff.gz | patch -p0'', I then modified the
> ``debian/rules2'' file manually, and then issued ``fakeroot make -f
> debian/rules binary''.
> 
> Thus to my knowledge I am building the version requested.  I was able to
> automate the above process when I fetched the ``stable'' version because
> my ``/etc/apt/sources.list'' includes the lines
> 
>   deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
>   deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
> 
> However I do not know of an obvious way to have ``apt-get source gcc''
> fetch the ``testing'' version of the package instead, so I tried
> (unsuccessfully) to modify the ``sources.list'' file by hand.  After
> downloading the files I was not sure how to have ``apt-get''
> automatically extract and patch using the files that are in the current
> directory.
> 
> I am happy to be of help, but I am not sure how to proceed at this
> point.  Thank you for your time.
> 
>  > mcrogan@purdue.edu writes:
> 
>  >> >> Subject: gcc: Rebuild of gcc 1:2.95.2-13 from source with extra CFLAGS causes Internal compiler error (gpc1 coredumps)
>  >> >> Package: gcc
>  >> >> Version: 1:2.95.2-13
> 
>  >> > please retry with the current gcc-2.95 from testing/unstable (2.95.4).
> 
>  >> Thank you for the response.  I tried building the testing version after
>  >> verifying that I have all dependencies to do so (I am running
>  >> stable-2.2r4), and the output I get is follows.  I hope to be of
>  >> assistance, but I am not sure how to proceed.  Please let me know if I
>  >> can be of further help.
> 
>  >> ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
> 
>  >> ../.././xgpc -B../.././  -c -I. -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g3 -O3   -DRTS_RELEASE_STRING="'`cat /home/mcrogan/test2/gcc-2.95.2.orig/src-native/gcc/p/rts/rts-version`'" --unit-path=/home/mcrogan/test2/gcc-2.95.2.orig/src-native/gcc/p/rts --automake /home/mcrogan/test2/gcc-2.95.2.orig/src-native/gcc/p/rts/error.pas
>  >> In file included from /home/mcrogan/test2/gcc-2.95.2.orig/src-native/gcc/p/rts/error.pas:197:


-- 
*--v------ Installing Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 For PowerPC -----v----*
|  <http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-     |
|  (pause for breath)    powerpc/current/doc/install.en.html>    |
|         debian-imac: <http://debian-imac.sourceforge.net>      |
|            Chris Tillman        tillman@azstarnet.com          |
|                     May the Source be with you                 |
*----------------------------------------------------------------*



Reply to: