On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 11:38:43PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > And less "I'm the package maintainer, this is my castle, go away" and > more "This is how the majority does it, you follow, the benefit of it > being one way, not a dozen different, outweight some personal > preferences". Let's cut to the chase of this. Statement: every Debian package must be maintained in Git on salsa and every Debian Developer with upload rights to the archive should have commit/push right to every packaging repository on salsa. DPL candidates: do you agree with this statement? If so, what will be your approach to make this a reality? (I'm putting on the side, on purpose, the problem of different workflows that Joerg has highlighted. Not because it's not a real problem, but because I think it's a distraction to discussing/fixing the more substantial problem of access rights and package ownership.) Cheers -- Stefano Zacchiroli . zack@upsilon.cc . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature