On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:25:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:59:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:30:54AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > > Anthony Towns: > > > > For concreteness, here's what I think we should be doing: > > > I like. One minor nit: > > > > 1. Each voter's ballot ranks the options being voted on. Not > > > > all options need be ranked. > > > Giving the same rank to more than one option is permitted. > > I think Anthony may be trying to leave that to the discretion of the > > person preparing the ballot (the Project Secretary). > > Mainly I'm trying to not have to write it up. Well, hopefully cooler heads will prevail. :) > > No, voters propose General Resolutions and amendments thereto, not > > ballot options per se. > > *cough* I don't understand. Constitution A.2.3: # The person who calls for a vote states what they believe the wordings # of the resolution and any relevant amendments are, and consequently # what form the ballot should take. However, the final decision on the # form of ballot(s) is the Secretary's - see 7.1(1), 7.1(3) and A.3(6). -- G. Branden Robinson | There's nothing an agnostic can't Debian GNU/Linux | do if he doesn't know whether he branden@debian.org | believes in it or not. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Graham Chapman
Attachment:
pgpHwxXIB9Y3f.pgp
Description: PGP signature