On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:59:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:30:54AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > Anthony Towns: > > > For concreteness, here's what I think we should be doing: > > I like. One minor nit: > > > 1. Each voter's ballot ranks the options being voted on. Not > > > all options need be ranked. > > Giving the same rank to more than one option is permitted. > I think Anthony may be trying to leave that to the discretion of the > person preparing the ballot (the Project Secretary). Mainly I'm trying to not have to write it up. > > s/amendment/option/ ? > No, voters propose General Resolutions and amendments thereto, not > ballot options per se. *cough* Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Attachment:
pgp9dgaa93Xl3.pgp
Description: PGP signature