On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 12:33:23PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote: > On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 07:01, Branden Robinson wrote: > > No, in fact I'd venture to say it's unacceptable. > > And I will venture to say "step the fuck off". Of course, I read this message only after sending my very long followup where, wonder of wonders, I take note of Brainfood's long history of contribution to Debian. I'm sorry you took so much of that mail personally. I didn't want to get bogged down in the specifics of this week's incident because: 1) I don't have full possession of the facts in the issue at question; and 2) I think we should try to keep the DPL campaign focused on principles and not let it get bogged down in hot-button issues, like "should we drop support for non-free". I Cc'ed the people I did because I *did* perceive a failure of process, but it wasn't completely clear to me where the lines of communication were broken. Was it between Brainfood and DSA, between DSA and the developers, or what? If you're not following the traffic on the debian-vote list closely, I can see how a bunch of hypotheticals might get construed as a mixed bag of random accusations. My context was a DPL campaign question. Your context is as "incident", which, as you said, might not even be a security breach at all, but is certainly real-world and not highfalutin' platform stuff. So again, I apologize for contributing to the confusion surrounding the siutation with Debian machines hosted at Brainfood. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | kernel panic -- causal failure branden@debian.org | universe will now reboot http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpiD035oU96l.pgp
Description: PGP signature