[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT - Convert output of byte count to GB count?



On 2/16/2013 3:40 PM, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Hallo,
* Jerry Stuckle [Sat, Feb 16 2013, 01:36:42PM]:

On 2/16/2013 5:43 AM, Eduard Bloch wrote:
In fact, the main reason for becoming a drama is the impression that
numbers have on some people's mind. "I bought a 32 gig stick and Windows
says it's not even 30 gig on it... that's FRAUD!!"

Sure it has 32GB on it.  But that doesn't mean 32GB is available for
your files.  There is OS overhead, also.

Bullshit. Overhead does not consume 7% of the disk capacity. This is
just the difference between 1 GiB and 1 GB.

Funny. I made an example to demonstrate the irrational
effects that numbers have on people, and you both immediately start a
holy war based on it.

Overhead can easily take up 7% of the disk, depending on the file system
being used.

Let me rephrase it. Can you provide an example of a freshly created
filesystem of a common size with an overhead of at least 7%, i.e. with
the free space being less than 93 % of the raw size ?



How about answering my question.  Exactly which disk do you have

I am with him. There is no real question from you that I could discover
so far, just some attempts to distract attention after not understanding
the point (or even the content) of the original example.

Regards,
Eduard.



Maybe you should learn to read. He made a statement - I challenged it. So far he hasn't answered my question.

But I DID answer his question - although you conveniently trimmed that part of the message (as other points which prove that it is NOT a "defined standard" by the applicable body.

But then trolls often do trim parts they want to ignore, instead of responding to them.


Reply to: