Re: How do you read logs?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 26.12.2012 17:41, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2012/12/26 Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>:
>>> jugree@lavabit.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are a lot of `possible break-in attempts' messages in
>>>>> my logs. So it's hard to read them `by hand' (with last or
>>>>> more). How do you read yours? Do you use any log analyzers?
>>>>> Which ones?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/logtool
>>>
>>> Hugo
> ossec
I use logwatch. It can also email the important events daily without
the need of running it by hand.
- --
Mika Suomalainen
http://mkaysi.github.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Homepage: http://mkaysi.github.com/
Comment: Public key: http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/0x82A46728.txt
Comment: gpg --fetch-keys http://mkaysi.github.com/PGP/0x82A46728.txt
Comment: Fingerprint = 24BC 1573 B8EE D666 D10A AA65 4DB5 3CFE 82A4 6728
Comment: I have personal problem with PGP/MIME...
Comment: ...so signature *IS* long. See http://git.io/6FLzWg
Comment: Please remove PGP lines in replies. http://git.io/nvHrDg
Comment: Charset of this message should be UTF-8.
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/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=d6gM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: