Re: Looking for an emacs replacement
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:11:04 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:21:30 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
>>
>>> lee wrote:
>>>> T o n g <mlist4suntong@yahoo.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Time to look for an all purpose editor to replace emacs.
>>
>> And you want to drop it just because of a problem with your settings
>> not being honored? Have you report it?
>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_text_editors
>>>>
>>>> You might as well use emacs more, there are so many little details
>>>> one doesn't think about anymore and then misses in others ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Funny thing, that does not have my favorite editor: mc.
>>
>> +1 for mcedit but I guess is far away from being a proper emacs
>> replacement O:-)
>>
>>
> But ought it not be part of a comparison of text editors?
Well, Tong was looking for an emacs replacement and emacs can do more
than the job of a text editor.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: