Re: gpg/pgp noise
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:18:56PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >(you've trimmed my initial investigation which indicates he
> > has at least one signatory.)
>
> "investigation"?
>
> Huh?
>
> How hard was it to see the key is signed by... the key holder (or
> another person called Mika?), using a key that was signed... by (Mika).
>
> That's *not* a chain of trust.
I clearly explained that his key was signed by another he owned, which in turn
was signed by *someone else entirely*. You are committing a more serious
mailing list sin than inline-PGP: failing to properly read the thread before
replying to it.
Reply to: