[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re (6): /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mutt



From:	Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:21:09 +0200
> $ apt-cache policy mutt
>  ...
>  *** 1.5.21-4~bpo60+1 0
>         100 http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/ squeeze-backports/main i386 Packages
>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status


Thanks Andrei.  I'll still wait for stable Wheezy before any further activity on this.

Incidentally, there is another way for the mailing list server to handle 
replies which I imagine to be trivially simple, more reliable and not 
subject to malicious abuse.  Rather than target a mailto URI the reply 
link in the archived message could target a Draft text.  Draft here has 
the meaning as in "man mutt".  The References and In-reply-to fields 
could be present with no conflict with changes in mutt.

Regards,              ... Peter E.



-- 
Telephone 1 360 639 0202.  bcc: peasthope ... shaw.ca
"http://carnot.yi.org/ "
"http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/index.html#Itinerary "


Reply to: