In <[🔎] pan.2011.05.19.17.19.57@gmail.com>, Camaleón wrote: >On Wed, 18 May 2011 20:15:33 -0700, Mark wrote: >> I had to add the squeeze-proposed-updates repos to my sources.list after >> learning about the intel 855gm bug in squeeze that requires a fix from >> the proposed updates section. After apt-get update and apt-get upgrade, >> 13 packages were updated/upgraded including apt. Am I supposed to keep >> the proposed updates repos active in sources.list for the life of >> squeeze, or do something else? What if I comment it out now? > >http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates > >It seems to be a preliminary stage where devels put their packages before >they enter into the regular path (they fall into the "security update" or >"stable" repos). I thought security fixes usually showed up on the security repositories first and then were moved into s-p-u. Traditionally, s-p-u has been sort of a staging area for fixes that should be included in the next point release of stable (which includes both security updates and "important" bug fixes). I believe for Squeeze and forward it will also serve as a staging area for stable-updates (the replacement for volatile). -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.