Tom H wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > Why is that strange? The official documentation for GNU projects is > > texinfo documentation. It has been this way for a very long time. > > It is strange because it would have been easy and wold not have been > taxing to have a > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grublegacy.html page for > those people who need to consult or refer others to grub-legacy's > manual online. Well... If you (and Camaleón) feel that strongly about it then discussing it here should just be a launching point to taking the discussion to upstream. Don't be shy about giving them feedback! Otherwise how will they know? I am sure they will have considered this already but every vote is going to help sway them over to your way of thinking. However I would expect that in return they would try hard to get you to upgrade. [Note: The main grub page says that you need to be subscribed to grub-devel to post there but let me assure you that isn't true. But they set reply-to back to the list (evil villians!) so if you are not reading the list itself you won't see a response.] > Furthermore, many distributions default to grub1, Debian Stable, > Fedora, RHEL and its clones (in the latter case, probably until 2014 > for RHEL 5 and, since RHEL 6 is based on F12/F13, probably until 2017 > for RHEL 6). Debian Squeeze, quite soon to be the next Stable, has moved to grub2. The others are on their own but I am sure will upgrade in due time. Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature