[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hundreds of sshd processes spawned by Postgresql



Sorry, Hanspeter, for the extra posting to you directly.

----- Original Message ----
> From: Hanspeter Spalinger <hanfi@spahan.ch>
> schrieb Marc Shapiro:
> I am running a Lenny box, with 
> 
postgressq-8.4.
> 
> I ran ps -e, just now, and there were 
over 350 
> sshd processes running under user postgres.  I killed 
the postgresql-8.4 
> process, but the sshd processes were still 
there, so I killed them.  I then 
> started postgres again, 
followed by ssh.  I immediately ran ps -e and the 
> where over 
200 sshd processes, again.  Is this normal?  There should 
> not 
be anything running, that I know of, that should be accessing any 
> databases.

- - are those sshds logins (eg, not servers)?
check 'netstat -anp | 
> grep sshd'.
if those processes are LISTEN, 
they are servers, if they 
> are
ESTABLISHED, you seeing login 
(attempts maybe)

If those are 
> servers, you most likely 
got hacked -> get help from google
and friends 
> for 
advice.
If those are login (attempts) read on.

- - are those 
> actual connections or just login attempts? On my squeeze
logged in 
users show 
> 2 lines like:
root     26011  [...]        
> Ss   15:04   0:00 sshd: spahan [priv]
spahan   26013  
> 
[...]        S    15:04   0:00 sshd: 
> spahan@pts/1
For login 
attempts it shows
root     26126  
> [...]        Ss   15:24   
0:00 sshd: spahan 
> [priv]
sshd     26127  [...]        
> S    15:24   0:00 sshd: spahan [net]



I am getting lines 
like:
tcp        0      1 192.168.1.2:49526       59.120.141.34:22        SYN_SENT    9853/sshd
tcp        0      0 192.168.1.2:35055      59.120.163.53:22        ESTABLISHED 9995/sshd

Most of the lines (about 120?) say ESTABLISHED.  Only about 6 say SYN_SENT.

Does 
this mean someone is attempting to connect, but has not yest been 
successful?


I will check pstree after I get home from work.

Meanwhile, I keep shutting shown postgres and killing the processes.
-- 
Marc Shapiro
mshapiro_42@yahoo.com


Reply to: