Re: What prevents mounting of USB devices?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> Did you have any security upgrades lately
Sure, I install them regularly. Doesn't everybody?
> or did you install packages from backports or volatile
I do have the following as part of my sources.conf:
deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile lenny/volatile main
contrib non-free
deb-src http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile lenny/volatile main
contrib non-free
deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org lenny main
I am not sure if I actually installed anything from volatile.
> or any non-Debian stuff?
Yes, from debian-multimedia.org. Presumably that counts as non-Debian.
> Another thing to try is to activate the desktop icons for removable
> devices and test if users can mount the devices by clicking on the
> icons.
Sorry to sound stupid, but how do I activate those? Right now I don't
see any icons on the desktop when plugging devices in.
> I suspect that the fstab entry is not really a problem. Maybe you can
> setup pmount for the individual users so that it is more convenient.
Yes, the pmount works fine now, it did not even require setting anything up.
> Unfortunately I do not understand what else your dbus error message is
> trying to tell us. I would run "lshal --monitor", then plug in a USB
> stick and try to mount it; maybe that will turn up something useful.
>
> Seeing what hal knows about a USB stick might also help; hal can be
> queried like this:
>
> lshal -u $(hal-find-by-property --key block.device --string "/dev/sdX")
> lshal -u $(hal-find-by-property --key block.device --string "/dev/sdX1")
>
> (Replace "sdX" as is appropriate)
Thanks for showing and explaining lshal to me. I'll explore with it and
report if I find something interesting.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkvDqA4ACgkQ+VSRxYk4408SyACeLV3a1tt3VKgvTwya+oBz71Nu
IgQAn0hgk+w/0ykMQB/vtjNRf1oeLyib
=3B0A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: