Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:57 -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Feb 09 2005, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > The 96Mbps speed that USB2 reached on my system is only 20% of it's
> > theoretical maximum.
> >
> > The 240Mbps (8 * 30MBps) that 1394a reached on my system is 60% of
> > firewire's theoretical maximum.
>
> And that's not to mention anything about the CPU load, which on slower
> systems, means quite a lot.
Do you mean that USB uses more CPU?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.
After listening to many White House, Pentagon & CENTCOM briefings
in both Gulf Wars, it is my firm belief that most "senior
correspondents" either have serious agendas that don't get shaken
by facts, or are dumb as dog feces.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>